breadcrumb-navxt
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/jamtin6/myhealthandfitness.com/US/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Health magazines are always full of new ways to burn body fat faster than ever before. Modest to wild claims occur on a monthly basis as to what method is best to use. For the layperson, what is fact and what is fiction is often difficult to separate. This article should clarify some points for you. Also, you need to ask yourself why rather than what?<\/p>\n
There are two methods to get the body to burn fat through exercise and, there are proponents throughout the health and fitness industry for each of these methods, i.e., there are two camps of philosophy on which method is best and sometimes arguments can become pretty heated. Every exercise you perform though, will fall on or between these methods when it comes to burning fat. Additionally, you should know that simply by exercising, the body will burn more fat calories after the exercise than if you don\u2019t exercise. In this respect you should ask what is more important, the exercise or the method?<\/p>\n
The two methods are very simple: 1) The body burns fat best through low-energy use, sustained exercise. An example would be a long, slow walk or ride on a stationary bike at about 50 to 60% of maximal heart rate. For a conditioned person, this exercise level could be sustained for at least 4-6 hours. At this level, it would take almost three hours before the body begins to burn more fat than carbohydrates. 2) The body burns fat best by using a much higher-intensity exercise such as running or biking at 70-80% level of maximum heart rate. Using this method, the body begins to burn more fat than carbohydrates after about 18 minutes. Regardless of method used, the body will burn more fat than carbohydrates after exercising. It will do this for up to 6 hours.<\/p>\n
Is one of these methods better than the other for me? Two questions need to be asked: 1) Do you have time to perform method one? 2) Are you in good enough shape to perform method two?<\/p>\n
The reality is that when beginning an exercise, the first fuel source used is glycogen (sugar in the cell that comes from carbohydrates that we eat). Also, fat and, to a limited extent, protein provide energy, but not as efficiently or as quickly. Because glycogen is continually replenished, it will continue to be the fuel used until the cell cannot supply enough for the demand. Once this happens, the body becomes aware of it and begins to draw energy from free-fatty acids that are being metabolized from adipose (fat) tissue stores on the body. As a simple explanation, higher intakes of oxygen due to exercise and increased blood flow in the fat tissues begin to stimulate this process. When the body reaches this point, more calories will be burned from fat than from carbohydrates.<\/p>\n
What are examples of exercises that will get one to the point of burning fat faster than carbohydrates? The first example is running. If you jog at an average pace of 9-11 minutes per mile, it will required about 40 minutes of jogging before your body begins to burn more fat than carbohydrates. However, if you run faster, say about 6-7 minutes per mile, you\u2019ll reach this point in about 20 minutes or one-half the time of the slow pace. Sounds both logical and reasonable. Why? Because after each respective time, the energy demands on the cell are such that glycogen stores become depleted to the point that they cannot provide the energy they initially provided at the beginning of the exercise. When this happens, energy supply is then drawn from metabolized fatty acids. Sounds great doesn\u2019t it? Yes, but there are some pros and cons.<\/p>\n
Suppose you like to run, but also want to retain as much lean muscle mass as you can so that you have a more symmetrical shape than the typical large legs and skinny upper torso of a marathon runner. If this is what you desire, you have to be careful about how long you exercise at the increased intensity. For example, if you jog more than about 5-7 miles per day, glycogen cells become depleted, energy from fatty acids being metabolized cannot supply enough energy for demand and the body goes into a virtual starvation mode. But, it needs energy from someplace, where does this energy come from? The answer is from protein, but not from protein you ingest. The protein energy supply comes from cannibalization of muscle tissue, i.e., muscle mass is lost to the body\u2019s energy demand. In other words, the muscles are eaten alive. This is why marathon runners cannot keep muscle mass on their physique. Thus, we were able to burn lots of fat calories through long-distance running, but we lost muscle mass. If this is what you want then, this is a good method of exercising for you.<\/p>\n